
DnB 2.0
Thursday, September 28th, 2006
Just reading this story about Goldie kicking Redeyes for inofficially remixing Inner City Life and then handing the remix over to Fabio, and I thought “Man, this is so dnb 1.0″.
What’s so wrong with remixing a tune that’s already released? Remember Chris Su’s unofficial remixes? And look where’s at now. I don’t see the dark side of such unofficial remixes. If they’re done badly, noone will listen, and if they’re great you may want to release it. And even if you don’t, it’s good publicity, right?
What made me think of the parallels to the recent web2.0 phenomenon is that we’ve come to a technological power where it’s easily possible to extract fundamental elements of a released track and then combine them in new ways, thereby creating some kind of a remix, only with extra boundaries. Call it a mashup. This approach a dogma. We need more unoffical remixes! Who wants to wait until Renegade Hardware after some boring remixes finally decides to have someone remix Beckoning? It’s close to official, that tunes older than two years productionwise can’t compete with the new stuff, no matter how interesting they are trackwise. Why not take some old favourites of yours and give them a special treatment? Layer new drums? Play it out in the club?
Remember John B? Why is he so popular? Because he’s crazy guy, dressing up like huh, playing electrostyle tunes? Maybe. Because he always has fresh mashups to play? Sure!
And one thing that’s spinning in my head for ages now: Why not remix a remix? There dozens of examples where the remix is way better than the original. Trace used to do that with Mutations, and it’s been a great success. Where are the innovating labels?
Thinking 2.0, maybe there’s even new ways of making money out of this. Selling remix packs. Licensing. Micropayment percentage of a re-remix. If anyone is willing to put work in, why not cooperate?
Just reading this story about Goldie kicking Redeyes for inofficially remixing Inner City Life and then handing the remix over to Fabio, and I thought “Man, this is so dnb 1.0″.
What’s so wrong with remixing a tune that’s already released? Remember Chris Su’s unofficial remixes? And look where’s at now. I don’t see the dark side of such unofficial remixes. If they’re done badly, noone will listen, and if they’re great you may want to release it. And even if you don’t, it’s good publicity, right?
What made me think of the parallels to the recent web2.0 phenomenon is that we’ve come to a technological power where it’s easily possible to extract fundamental elements of a released track and then combine them in new ways, thereby creating some kind of a remix, only with extra boundaries. Call it a mashup. This approach a dogma. We need more unoffical remixes! Who wants to wait until Renegade Hardware after some boring remixes finally decides to have someone remix Beckoning? It’s close to official, that tunes older than two years productionwise can’t compete with the new stuff, no matter how interesting they are trackwise. Why not take some old favourites of yours and give them a special treatment? Layer new drums? Play it out in the club?
Remember John B? Why is he so popular? Because he’s crazy guy, dressing up like huh, playing electrostyle tunes? Maybe. Because he always has fresh mashups to play? Sure!
And one thing that’s spinning in my head for ages now: Why not remix a remix? There dozens of examples where the remix is way better than the original. Trace used to do that with Mutations, and it’s been a great success. Where are the innovating labels?
Thinking 2.0, maybe there’s even new ways of making money out of this. Selling remix packs. Licensing. Micropayment percentage of a re-remix. If anyone is willing to put work in, why not cooperate?




Download vcard